Tuesday 29 April 2014

APPEAL FROM GENERAL SECRETARY, AISBCEU

A P P E A L
                I am very happy to circulate this appeal to all SBCO staff particularly to all junior SBCO officials [Newly recruited] to know the past activities of AISBCE Union and its achievements for SBCO cadre. In addition to, it is my responsibility to bring your kind notice about the hindrance created by the Rival SBCO Association & its federation.

  1. After the formation of SBCO cadre, the AISBCE Union was established to protect the welfare of SBCO cadre with separate identity i.e. the PA, SBCO should not be engaged in General line as Postal Assistant. 

  2. In General line of Postal wing, the PAs who had completed 16 years was allowed for TBOP promotion w.e.f. 1983, but at the same time, even though some of our SBCO staff was members of rival Union, this promotion was not claimed by the rival Union from 1983 to 1991 including for administrative cadre of Circle/Regional Office. After our intervention by SBCO Union with the Dy.Prime Minister [Late]Sri.Devilal, the TBOP promotion was signed as on 01.08.1991 and BCR promotion w.e.f. 01.10.1991/ Otherwise, we have to continue our service until retirement as LDC/UDC.
  3.  
  4. After our TBOP/BCR promotion to SBCO cadre, the administrative cadre of Circle/Regional Office staff got the TBOP/BCR promotion w.e.f 01.10.1993 after our promotion of two years. It meant that the rival Union did not take any action for their own people of administrative cadre.
  5.  
  6. In the meant time i.e. from 1983 to 1991. Our SBCO Union had taken efforts with administration to implement 80:20 [UDC/LDC] promotion to SBCO cadre likewise Postal audit staff. But, it was objected by the rival Union, otherwise we may also be treated as Postal accounts organized cadre. 
  7.  
  8. In 2003, the Union had taken efforts for the modification of TBOP/BCR promotions to the 250 officials of SBCO cadre with huge arrears.
  9.  
  10. More number of LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I posts were created for the senior officials promotion in all Circles..
  11.  
  12. Transfer of SBCO staff – Some time past, during Rotational transfer, the SBCO officials were transferred from end to end of the Region. Our Union General Secretary Sri.I.D.Sharma had given suicide notice to the Directorate to implement the Rotational transfers with in the cluster. After that only, the Directorate issued orders to form the clusters by merging 2 to 3 HOS and transfers the officials with in the cluster. In the history of service Unions, Sri.I.D.Sharma is the only General Secretary issuing notice to the Department for the welfare of SBCO staff.

  13. Nomination of Divisional Representative post – It was approved by the Directorate to solve the divisional problems with Divisional Heads in the monthly meeting just like other Unions.
The main achievement of the above mentioned staff welfare matters are brought to your kind notice to realize the service rendered by our Union for SBCO staff and identify your support to AISBCE Union. In the past 3 years, the only achievement of the rival Union i.e. the false recognition by including our membership Jharkhand Circle and JK Circle as given below...
 
As per the Directorate Letter No:16/78/2010-SR Dt: 01.10.2012, it was declared that they got 491 membership out of 3030 of total members with 16.20%. Our Union checked this figure by calling RTI information from all Circles. At that time, it was found that the of J&K and Jharghand Circle membership was wrongly included   with Rival Union figures for recognition purpose. Now, the CPMG of J&K and Jharghand Circle had written letter to the Director, SR  Sri.Arun Malik, that the membership of J8K Circle -23 Members and Jharghand Circle -47 totally 70 members are belongs to AISBCE Union instead of Rival Union .

As such, now the percentage has come down to 13.89% from 16.20% i.e. deemed for de-recognition. 
 
Total Members  -       3030
Rival Union Members  -           491
Percentage  -                           16.20
Total Members  -        3030
Less J&K    – 23
Jharghand – 47
 
Membership of AISBCE Union wrongly included with Rival Union = 491 – 70 =                 421
Revised percentage -           13.89


In the past three years, other than the above false recognition, if any other welfare item was achieved, it may be published in their website.
 
     ENROLLMENT OF NEW MEMBERSHIP – LAST DATE 30.04.2014
 
Dear Comrades,

            I appeal to all newly recruited SBCO staff and the members of SBCO Association to go through the above appeal and realize the services of AISBCE Union and its staff welfare.
           
It is the time to you all to identify your membership by giving your declaration form to the Circle Secretary. All Circle Secretaries are requested to collect the Membership declaration form and forward the same to the Divisional Head on or before 30.04.2014.

                                                                                                R.K.TANDON
                                                               GENERAL SECRETARY

Cadre Restructuring Agreement signed

The  JCM Staff side, Departmental council ( NFPE & FNPO) has signed the cadre restructuring proposal after several rounds of protracted negotiations with the administration on 28.04.2014. 
 
The Salient features of the agreement are as follows :

1. Number of LSG posts will increase from 8 % to 22 %
 
2. Number of HSG II  posts will increase from 2 % to 12 %
 
3. Number of HSG I  posts will increase from 1.5 % to 4 %
 
4. After completion of 2 years in HSG I the official will be promoted to 4800 GP (Non-functional Basis)
 
5. The above proposal will be applicable to RMS, Circle
 
 Office and SBCO in the same ratio
 
6. Postman/Mail guard will get the same ratio of promotion.

                       Service Unions  demand for separate higher pay scale for PO& RMS Accountants, Creation of separate cadre for System Administrators or grant of special pay/allowance, bringing MTS also under cadre restructuring etc is not accepted by the administration. Regarding Postmaster Cadre after much bargaining, it is agreed to examine our claim for higher pay scale after the present proposal is approved by the government .

The present proposal is to be approved by Postal Board, DoPT & Finance Ministry.
Source : AIPEU P3CHQ

Monday 28 April 2014

Clarification on increase in certain allowances by further 25 percent as a result of enhancement of Dearness Allowances w.e.f. 1.1.2014 -

No.A-27012/1/2014-Estt. (Allowance)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension
Department of Personnel & Training
Block-IV, Old JNU Campus
New Delhi, 28th April, 2014.
OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Clarification on increase in certain allowances by further 25% as a result of enhancement of Dearness Allowances w.e.f. 1.1.2014


The undersigned is directed to refer to para 1(j) of this Department’s 0M. No.12011/03/2008-Estt. (Allowance) dated 2.9.2008. This provides that the limits ofChildren Education Allowance would be automatically raised by 25% every time the Dearness Allowance on the revised pay structure goes up by 50%. References are being received from various quarters with regard to the amount of Children Education Allowance admissible consequent upon enhancement of Dearness Allowance payable to Central Government employees @ 100% w.e.f. 1 January, 2014 announced vide Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure O.M. No.1/l/2014-E-1I (B) dated 27th March, 2014.

2. In accordance with the above, the following shall be the revised limits:

a) The annual ceiling limit for reimbursement of Children Education Allowance shall be Rs.18,000/- per child. Accordingly, the quarterly claim could be more than Rs.4500/- in one quarter. The Hostel Subsidy shall be Rs.4500/- per month per child;

b) The rates of Special Allowance for Child Care to women with disabilities stands revised to Rs. 1500/- per month; and

c) The annual ceiling for reimbursement of Children Education Allowance for disabled children of Government employees shall be treated as revised to Rs.36,000/- per annum per child and the rates of Hostel Subsidy for disabled children of Government employees shall be treated as revised to Rs.9000/- per child per month.

3. These revisions are applicable with effect from 1st January, 2014.

4. These revisions shall be subject to other terms and conditions mentioned in this Department’s O.M. No.12011/03/2008-Estt (Allowance) dated 2.9.2008, O.M. No.12011/04/2008 dated 11.9.2008 and 12011/07(i)12011-Estt.(AL) dated 21.2.2012.


sd/
(Mukul Ratra)
Director

SBCO Transfers in Visakhapatnam Region.



The following transfers of SBCO officials in Visakhapatnam Region are hereby ordered by the competent authority vide memo no ICO(SB)/SBCO/RT dated 25-04-2014.
Name of the SBCO
Official(Sri/Smt/Kum)
Present place of working
Place to where
transferred
N.V.R.Sastry
Samalkot
Kakinada
D.Pushkara Rao
ICO(SB)
Rajahmundry
G.V.D.Prasad
Bobbili
Vizianagaram
T.Rama Raju
ICO(SB)
Retention at ICO(SB)
M.Jagadeeswara Rao
Visakhapatnam
Anakapalle
A.K.Roy
Kakinada
Samalkot
H.Vakaulamala
Vizianagaram
Amadalavalasa
K.Krupavaram
Amadalavalasa
Amalapuram
M.Madhavi
Anakapalle
Waltair RS
G.Atchyuta Rao
Waltair RS
Bobbili
M.Mahesh
Waltair RS
ICO(SB)

Sunday 27 April 2014

About Rule 38 Transfers

Rule 38 transfers may be permitted on the basis of declared vacancy i.e. direct recruit may be transferred against direct recruitment vacancy and promotee against a promotion vacancy. Further OC candidate should be transferred against OC vacancy, SC candidate against SC vacancy and ST candidate against ST vacancy.

(vi) Under Rule 38, inter-Circle and intra-Circle transfer from one distinct cadre to another viz. Post Offices to Circle Office, Regional Office, SBCO, Postal Assistant to Sorting Assistant etc, or vice versa is not allowed. 

(vii) Only such officials who have put in minimum service of five years in the case of direct recruits in the cadre in question and three years in the case of surplus qualified officials wherever applicable would be eligible for transfer under Rule 38. Any relaxation in this regard should be matter of rarest exception. Transfer of officials who have not yet cleared the probation period should be permitted in deserving cases only.

(viii) Under the existing instructions, Heads of Circles i.e. CPMGs are fully empowered to permit such transfers with the approval of CPMG of the other Circle, where the transfer is sought. ln such cases where the prescribed conditions are met the approval of the Direciorate's would not be necessary.

(ix) As and when the applications are received for such transfers, it should be recorded in the register, which will serve as priority list to be operated as and when vacancy (ies) arise.

(x) under Rule 38, an official will be allowed to seek transfer onlv twice during-his entire service.

Five foods to avoid in summer

While it's hot outside, there is also more heat generated in the body, which can make a person feel irritable, tired, have trouble sleeping and make him/her lose concentration. 

While drinking enough water is crucial, one must also have the right foods to stay fit and healthy in summer. And some foods can play havoc on the system at this time. Here are the foods that should be avoided...

Too much spice: Spice powders can certainly liven up a meal, but spices also can heat up the body eating as they boost the rate of metabolism.

Rich non-vegetarian fare: Summer is not the time to tuck into rich meat gravies or tandooris, fish and chicken, or even seafood. In fact, this makes a person sweat more and causes digestive problems. It can also lead to diarrhea.

Oily junk food: You must avoid burgers with meat patties, fries and other oily fare.
Tea and coffee: These are beverages that increase heat in the body so they are definitely avoidable. Did you know that caffeine and other beverages with sugar can actually dehydrate your body, making your face flushed?
Avoid sauces: A cheese sauce is very avoidable too. It has close to 350 calories and it leaves you feeling bloated and sluggish. Some sauces also have too much MSG (Monosodium Glutamate) and salt. Instead, keep the meal nutritious and natural.

FAQ on Children Education Allowance Scheme-DOPT orders on 01.04.2014.

The following FAQs supplement the FAQs in respect of Estt.(Allowances) Section already placed in public domain vide F. No.21011/08/2013-Estt.(AL)Establishment Allowances Section Children Education Allowance Scheme (CEA)

SI. No.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answer
1.Whether the examination fees as charged by the school is reimbursable? “Examination fee” has been included as part of reimbursable items as indicated in para 1(e) of O.M. dated 2nd September, 2008, subject to the fulfillment of other existing conditions vide) OM No.12011/01/2012-Estt.(AL) dated 31-07-2013. The said orders do not have a retrospective effect.
2.Whether reimbursement of amount of fee paid during 1at and 2nd quarter could be claimed in 3rd or 4th quarter, without the fee receipts of the 3rd and 4th quarter? No. As it is reimbursement for the whole year, original receipts for the fee paid for the 3rd / 4th quarter has to be submitted to ensure that the child has not dropped out of the school in the mid-session. O.M. No.12011/01/2013-Estt. Allowances dated 23.04.2013 refers.
3. Whether a Government servant is required to give a certificate that the spouse, if earning, has not claimed CEA?Yes. In terms of O.M. No.12011/01/2013-Estt.(Allowances) dated 23.04.2013, the claimant Government servant is required to furnish an undertaking that reimbursement of CEA has not been claimed in respect of the child by the spouse of the claimant.

Thursday 24 April 2014

7th CPC NEWS – COMPARISON OF 7th CPC AND 6th CPC QUESTIONNAIRE.

SIXTH CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION
Questionnaire 
7th CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION
Questionnaire 
1 Comparison with public/private sectors

1.1 Should there be any comparison/parity between
pay scales and perquisites in Government and the
 public/private sector?

1.2 Is it possible to quantify all other benefits, excluding pay, derived by employees in Government and the public and private sectors from security of tenure, promotional avenues, retirement packages, housing and other invisibles?


In view of these benefits, can there be any fair comparison between the salaries available in the government
 vis-à-vis the salaries in the private sector?

1.3 In order to ensure a fair comparison based on  principles of equity and social justice, would it not
also be appropriate to take into account the economic conditions of large sections of the community that are less privileged than Government employees and many of  whom live below the poverty line?

2. International comparisons
2.1 Some countries have raised civil service pay scales almost to levels prevalent in the private  sector on the hypothesis that a well-paid  bureaucracy
is likely to be honest and diligent. To what extent would such a hypothesis be valid and how far would  such a course of action be desirable?

3. Impact on other organizations
3.1 Salary structure in the Central and State  Governments is broadly similar. The recommendations
of the Pay Commission are likely to lead to similar demands from employees of State Governments,
 municipal bodies, panchayati raj institutions & autonomous institutions

Their paying capacity is considerably limited.
To what extent should this factor be considered in devising a reasonable remuneration package for Central Government employees?

4. Salaries


4.1 How should we determine the salary to be  paid to a Secretary in the Central Government?
Please suggest an appropriate basic pay for a Secretary?
Can appointment to this post be made on a contractual basis where salaries and tenure are linked to the performance in terms of achieving defined targets?

4.2 What should be the reasonable ratio between the minimum and the maximum of a pay scale?

4.3 Is it necessary to persist with a pre-determined minimum-maximum ratio on ideological considerations?
Or is it more important to ensure efficient administration by preventing flight of outstanding talent from Government?

5. Relativities


5.1 Employees in the Secretariat and analogous establishments are entitled to higher pay scales than the corresponding field functionaries. This was supposed to compensate them for the loss of certain facilities available to them in field assignments and the extra effort required for decision-making at the policy level. Are these factors valid even today particularly in the context of
decentralization and devolution of administrative powers?


Is this discrimination between field and secretariat  functionaries even justified today?

6. Group-A Services


6.1 Is there a case for a Unified Civil Service, merging  therein all Central (both technical and non-technical)
and All India Services, allowing vertical and horizontal movement?
 Or should there be two distinct streams, one embracing all the technical services and the other for non-technical services?

6.2 Do you feel that the pattern of pay scales for all Group A Services should be redesignated so as to attract candidates of the requisite caliber? Keeping in view some of the compensation packages being offered to fresh professionals by the private sector, what emoluments would you suggest for an entrant to a Group-A Service in Government?

7. Professional personnel


7.1 Should there be a higher compensation package for scientists in certain specialized streams/departments like Department of Space, Department of Atomic Energy? If so, what should be the reasonable package in their case?

8. Classification of posts


8.1 Presently, civilian posts in the Central Government are classified into four Groups (‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ & ‘D’) with reference to their scales of pay. The Fifth Central Pay Commission had recommended their reclassification into Executive, Supervisory, Supporting and Auxiliary Staff.
Would you suggest any changes in the existing
classification or should the classification recommended by
Fifth Central Pay Commission be adopted with/without modifications?

9. Restructuring of Group ‘C’ & ‘D’ posts
9.1 Should all lower Group ‘C’ functionaries in the Secretariat be replaced by multi-functional Executive Assistants, who would be graduates and well versed in office work, secretarial skills and use of modern office equipment including computers? Should similar arrangements can be evolved for Group ‘C’ posts in other organisations of Government?

9.2 Should a similar regrouping of Group D staff into fewer categories capable of performing diverse functions also be carried out?

10. Pay Scales
10.1 How should a pay scale be structured? What is a reasonable ratio between the minimum and maximum
of a pay scale?

10.2 The successive Pay Commissions have progressively reduced the number of distinct pay scales. The number of scales has therefore come down from more than 500 scales at the time of the Second Central Pay Commission to 51 scales before Fifth Central Pay Commission, which was
brought down to 33 scales by the Fifth Central Pay Commission. The reduction in the number of pay scales brings in attendant problems like the promotion and the feeder grades coming to lie in the same pay scale, etc. Do you feel whether the existing number of pay scales should be retained or increased or decreased or whether the same should be replaced by a running pay scale?

11. Increments
11.1 What should be the criteria for determining the rates and frequency of increments in respect of different scales of pay? Should these bear a uniform or varying relationship with the minima and/or maxima of the scales?

12. Revision of pay scales
12.1 Is there any need to revise the pay scales periodically especially when 100% neutralization for inflation is available in form of dearness allowance?

12.2 How should pay be fixed in the revised pay scales? Should there be a point-to-point fixation? If not, please suggest a method by which it can be ensured that senior personnel are not placed at a disadvantage vis-à-vis their juniors and due weightage is given for the longer service rendered by the former.

13. Compensatory Allowances
13.1 Is City Compensatory Allowance a sufficient compensation for the problems of a large city? If DA and HRA provide full neutralization, do you think CCA should continue? Is there a need for changing the basis of classification of cities and the rates of CCA? If so, please suggest the revised basis and rates.

14. Pay and perquisites for Armed Forces


14.1 What should be the basis for determination of pay scales for Armed Forces Personnel? What percentage weightage should be assigned to (i) parity with civil services, (ii) comparison with private sector, (iii) special and hazardous nature of duties, (iv) short career span and (v) restricted rights?

14.2 How should the pay of a soldier, sailor and airman be determined? How should it relate to the minimum wage in Government and the pay of a constable in paramilitary or internal security forces?

15. Abolition of feudalism
15.1 Should all vestiges of feudalism in the country like huge residential bungalows sprawling over several acres, large number of servants’ quarters, retinues of personal staff, bungalow peons, use of uniformed personnel as batmen or on unnecessary security or ceremonial duties etc. be abolished? Please make concrete suggestions.

16. Specific proposals
16.1 In what manner can Central Government organizations functioning be improved to make them more professional, citizen-friendly and delivery oriented?

16.2 Please outline specific proposals, which could result in:

(i) Reduction and redeployment of staff,
(ii) Reduction of paper work,
(iii) Better work environment,
(iv) Economy in expenditure,
(v) Professionalisation of services,
(vi) Reduction in litigation on service matters,
(vii) Better delivery of service by government agencies to their users.

17. New concepts
17.1 Do you think the concepts of contractual appointment, part-time work, flexible job description, flexi time etc. need to be introduced in Government to change the environment, provide more jobs and impart flexibility to the working conditions of employees?

17.2 For improving punctuality/introducing new concepts like flexi time, should biometric entry/exit be introduced?

17.3 What steps should be taken to ensure that scientists, doctors, engineers and other professionals with sophisticated education and skills are retained in their specialized fields in Government? Should they be appointed on contract with a higher status and initial pay, advance increments, better service conditions, etc.?

17.4 Should there be lateral movement from Government to non-Government jobs and vice versa? If so, in which sphere(s) and to what extent?

17.5 It has been suggested that existing Government employees should be encouraged to shift to employment on contract for specified periods in return for a substantially higher remuneration package. Would you agree?

18. Performance Appraisal


18.1 In what way should be present system of performance appraisal be changed? Should be ACR be an open document?

18.2 How far has the introduction of self-assessment helped in the process of appraisal?

18.3 Should appraisal be done for an entire team instead of for individuals?

18.4 In what manner can  Government employees be made personally accountable for their acts of omission or commission, without any special safeguards? Would you recommend any amendments to Article 311 of the Constitution, Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 17 and 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and various rules relating to conduct of Government servants and disciplinary proceedings?

19. Holidays


19.1 Kindly comment on the appropriateness of adopting a five-day week in Government offices when other sectors follow a six day week. Please also state whether the number of Gazetted holidays in Government offices should be reduced? Please also comment on the appropriateness of declaring Gazetted holidays for all major religious festivals.

19.2 What do you think is the state of work ethics and punctuality in Government offices? Kindly suggest ways of improving these.
1. Salaries
1.1 The considerations on which the minimum salary in case of the lowest Group ‘C’ functionary and the maximum salary in case of a Secretary level officer may be determined and what should be the reasonable ratio between the two.

1.2 What should be the considerations for determining salary for various levels of functions falling between the highest level and the lowest level functionaries?

2. Comparisons
2.1 Should there be any comparison/parity between pay scales and perquisites between Government and the private sector? If so, why? If not, why not?


2.2 Should there at all be any comparison/parity between pay scales and perquisites between Government and the public sector? If so, why? If not, why not?

2.3 The concept of variable pay has been introduced in Central Public Sector Enterprises by the Second Pay Revision Committee. In the case of the Government is there merit in introducing a variable component of pay? Can such variable pay be linked to performance?

3. Attracting Talent
3.1 Does the present compensation package attract suitable talent in the All India Services & Group A Services? What are your observations and suggestions in this regard?

3.2 To what extent should government compensation be structured to attract special talent?

4. Pay Scales
4.1 The 6th Central Pay Commission introduced the system of Pay Bands and Grade Pay as against the system of specific pay scales attached to various posts. What has been the impact of running pay bands post implementation of 6th CPC recommendations?

4.2 Is there any need to bring about any change?

4.3 Did the pay bands recommended by the Sixth CPC help in arresting exodus and attract talent towards the Government?

4.4 Successive Pay Commissions have reduced the number of pay scales by merging one or two pay scales together. Is there a case for the number of pay scales/ pay band to be rationalized and if so in what manner?

4.5 Is the “grade pay” concept working? If not, what are your alternative suggestions?

5. Increment
5.1 Whether the present system of annual increment on 1st July of every year uniformly in case of all employees has served its purpose or not? Whether any changes are required?
5.2 What should be the reasonable quantum of annual increment?

5.3 Whether there should be a provision of variable increments at a rate higher than the normal annual increment in case of high achievers? If so, what should be transparent and objective parameters to assess high achievement, which could be uniformly applied across Central Government?

5.4 Under the MACP scheme three financial up-gradations are allowed on completion of 10, 20, 30 years of regular service, counted from the direct entry grade. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the scheme? Is there a perception that a scheme of this nature, in some Departments, actually incentivizes people who do not wish to take the more arduous route of qualifying departmental examinations/ or those obtaining professional degrees?

6. Performance
What kind of incentives would you suggest to recognize and reward good performance?

7. Impact on other organizations
Salary structures in the Central and State Governments are broadly similar. The recommendations of the Pay Commission are likely to lead to similar demands from employees of State Governments, municipal bodies, panchayati raj institutions & autonomous institutions. To what extent should their paying capacity be considered in devising a reasonable remuneration package for Central Govt. employees?

8. Defence Forces
8.1 What should be the considerations for fixing salary in case of Defence personnel and in what manner does the parity with civil services need to be evolved, keeping in view their respective job profiles?

8.2 In what manner should the concessions and facilities, both in cash and kind, be taken into account for determining salary structure in case of Defence Forces personnel.

8.3 As per the November 2008 orders of the Ministry of Defence, there are a total of 45 types of allowances for Personnel Below Officer Rank and 39 types of allowances for Officers. Does a case exist for rationalization/ streamlining of the current variety of allowances?

8.4 What are the options available for addressing the increasing expenditure on defence pensions?

8.5 As a measure of special recognition, is there a case to review the present benefits provided to war widows?

8.6 As a measure of special recognition, is there a case to review the present benefits provided to disabled soldiers, commensurate to the nature of their disability?

9. Allowances
9.1 Whether the existing allowances need to be retained or rationalized in such a manner as to ensure that salary structure takes care not only of the job profile but the situational factors as well, so that the number of allowances could be at a realistic level?
9.2 What should be the principles to determine payment of House Rent Allowance?

10. Pension
10.1 The retirement benefits of all Central Government employees appointed on or after 1.1.2004 a re covered by the New Pension Scheme (NPS). What has been the experience of the NPS in the last decade?

10.2 As far as pre-1.1.2004 appointees are concerned, what should be the principles that govern the structure of pension and other retirement benefits?

11. Strengthening the public governance system
11.1 The 6th CPC recommended upgrading the skills of the Group D employees and placing them in Group C over a period of time. What has been the experience in this regard?

11.2 In what way can Central Government organizations functioning be improved to make them more efficient, accountable and responsible? Please give specific suggestions with respect to:

a) Rationalisation of staff strength and more productive deployment of available staff;

b) Rationalisation of processes and reduction of paper work; and

c) Economy in expenditure.

12. Training/ building competence
12.1 How would you interpret the concept of “competency based framework”?

12.2 One of the terms of reference suggests that the Commission recommend appropriate training and capacity building through a competency based framework.

a) Is the present level of training at various stages of a person’s career considered adequate? Are there gaps that need to be filled, and if so, where?

b) Should it be made compulsory that each civil service officer should in his career span acquire a professional qualification? If so, can the nature of the study, time intervals and the Institution(s) whose qualification are acceptable, all be stipulated?

c) What other indicators can best measure training and capacity building for personnel in your organization? Please suggest ways through which capacity building can be further strengthened?

13. Outsourcing
13.1 What has been the experience of outsourcing at various levels of Government and is there a case for streamlining it?

13.2 Is there a clear identification of jobs that can be outsourced?

14. Regulatory Bodies
14.1 Kindly list out the Regulators set up unde r Acts of Parliament, related to your Ministry/ Department. The total number of personnel on rolls (Chairperson and members + support personnel) may be indicated.

14.2 Regulators that may not qualify in terms of being set up under Acts of Parliament but perform regulatory functions may also be listed. The scale of pay for Chairperson /Members and other personnel of such bodies may be indicated.

14.3 Across the Government there are a host of Regulatory bodies set up for various purposes. What are your suggestions regarding emoluments structure for Regulatory bodies?

15. Payment of Bonus
One of the terms of reference of the 7th Pay Commission is to examine the existing schemes of payment of bonus. What are your suggestions
and observations in this regard?